За последние 3 дня в Буркина-Фасо силами боевиков проалькаидовской JNIM были атакованы 7 военных баз.
🇧🇫Сообщается об очередной атаке на военный объект под Фада-Нгурма, Восточная область. 4 солдата правительственных войск убиты, захвачено оружие. Сам объект теперь под контролем террористов.
🔫Об уязвимости этого района из-за близости к Национальному парку W (особо охраняемая природная территория с густым травостоем и лесом) я писала ранее, в свете предыдущих нападений: https://www.group-telegram.com/fr/angiezen.com/2036
За последние 3 дня в Буркина-Фасо силами боевиков проалькаидовской JNIM были атакованы 7 военных баз.
🇧🇫Сообщается об очередной атаке на военный объект под Фада-Нгурма, Восточная область. 4 солдата правительственных войск убиты, захвачено оружие. Сам объект теперь под контролем террористов.
🔫Об уязвимости этого района из-за близости к Национальному парку W (особо охраняемая природная территория с густым травостоем и лесом) я писала ранее, в свете предыдущих нападений: https://www.group-telegram.com/fr/angiezen.com/2036
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from fr
