Пенсионный фонд не получает страховые взносы от каждого четвертого трудоспособного россиянина, следует из данных Соцфонда. Эти люди не работают, занимаются натуральным хозяйством или воспитывают детей, объясняют эксперты. В будущем часть из них может лишиться минимальной пенсии. @banksta
Пенсионный фонд не получает страховые взносы от каждого четвертого трудоспособного россиянина, следует из данных Соцфонда. Эти люди не работают, занимаются натуральным хозяйством или воспитывают детей, объясняют эксперты. В будущем часть из них может лишиться минимальной пенсии. @banksta
BY Банкста
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Russian President Vladimir Putin launched Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the early-morning hours of February 24, targeting several key cities with military strikes. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from fr
