Преподаватели института МВД в Белгороде подрались возле отделения полиции
Драка с участием правоохранителей случилась прямо возле отдела полиции на улице Костюкова. В бою столкнулись два полковника и по совместительству преподавателя Белгородского юридического института МВД имени Путилина. Причина конфликта неизвестна.
Телеграм-канал Baza пишет, что в конфликте замешаны начальник кафедры оперативно-розыскной деятельности и начальник факультета заочного обучения. Первый отправился снимать побои: врачи зафиксировали ушибы мягких тканей и ссадину под глазом. С этим заключением преподаватель отправился в тот же самый отдел полиции — на этот раз писать заявление.
Преподаватели института МВД в Белгороде подрались возле отделения полиции
Драка с участием правоохранителей случилась прямо возле отдела полиции на улице Костюкова. В бою столкнулись два полковника и по совместительству преподавателя Белгородского юридического института МВД имени Путилина. Причина конфликта неизвестна.
Телеграм-канал Baza пишет, что в конфликте замешаны начальник кафедры оперативно-розыскной деятельности и начальник факультета заочного обучения. Первый отправился снимать побои: врачи зафиксировали ушибы мягких тканей и ссадину под глазом. С этим заключением преподаватель отправился в тот же самый отдел полиции — на этот раз писать заявление.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from fr