Глава республики Дон заметил, что старейшины ругаются, дон, потому что гарант в ту сторону не ездит. Якобы Путин отстроил Чечню, а посмотреть на плоды своих трудов не хочет. Если переводить весь запинающийся спич на человеческий язык (убирая закадровый то ли смех, то ли чей-то инфаркт), то смысл один: чеченской республике не хватает внимания.
Глава республики Дон заметил, что старейшины ругаются, дон, потому что гарант в ту сторону не ездит. Якобы Путин отстроил Чечню, а посмотреть на плоды своих трудов не хочет. Если переводить весь запинающийся спич на человеческий язык (убирая закадровый то ли смех, то ли чей-то инфаркт), то смысл один: чеченской республике не хватает внимания.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change.
from fr
