Волчок, ну ты чего опять. Просто Кобзев хочет запретить майнинг, а Лена Кутергина только только после летней кампании в гараже и на даче машинки поставила, чтобы крипту качать. А тут такая новость. Зато привычка кушать красную икру с лобстерами и запивать дорогим шампанским уже выработалась. Вот и продается теперь кому ни попадя, попутно раскачивая братскую лодку.
Волчок, ну ты чего опять. Просто Кобзев хочет запретить майнинг, а Лена Кутергина только только после летней кампании в гараже и на даче машинки поставила, чтобы крипту качать. А тут такая новость. Зато привычка кушать красную икру с лобстерами и запивать дорогим шампанским уже выработалась. Вот и продается теперь кому ни попадя, попутно раскачивая братскую лодку.
Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from fr
