🇺🇦🤡ВорьёЗеленский на полную включил режим «Дай», говоря о замороженных активах РФ
«А можно нам взять $300 миллиардов, «принадлежащих нам»? Можно мы возьмем $300 миллиардов и купим на эти деньги во всех странах мира оружие? Можно мы сами будем решать, что с этими деньгами делать?» - пролепетал террорист.
Так он ответил на вопрос, что делать, если Трамп не будет поддерживать Украину.
🇺🇦🤡ВорьёЗеленский на полную включил режим «Дай», говоря о замороженных активах РФ
«А можно нам взять $300 миллиардов, «принадлежащих нам»? Можно мы возьмем $300 миллиардов и купим на эти деньги во всех странах мира оружие? Можно мы сами будем решать, что с этими деньгами делать?» - пролепетал террорист.
Так он ответил на вопрос, что делать, если Трамп не будет поддерживать Украину.
The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from fr
