🇸🇪🇹🇷Анкара может одобрить заявку на присоединение Стокгольма к НАТО до саммита Североатлантического альянса в июле, сообщил глава турецкого МИД Мевлют Чавушоглу
«В минувшую пятницу я говорил с главой МИД Швеции. Сообщил ему о решении по Финляндии, чтобы он его сначала узнал от нас. Он выразил надежду, что процесс вступления в НАТО завершится до саммита альянса, на что я ответил: «Все зависит от вас», - сказал глава МИД Турции.
🇸🇪🇹🇷Анкара может одобрить заявку на присоединение Стокгольма к НАТО до саммита Североатлантического альянса в июле, сообщил глава турецкого МИД Мевлют Чавушоглу
«В минувшую пятницу я говорил с главой МИД Швеции. Сообщил ему о решении по Финляндии, чтобы он его сначала узнал от нас. Он выразил надежду, что процесс вступления в НАТО завершится до саммита альянса, на что я ответил: «Все зависит от вас», - сказал глава МИД Турции.
But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from fr
