Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/bystronews/-97424-97425-97424-): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 БЫСТРО | Telegram Webview: bystronews/97424 -
🇷🇺⚔️Армия России продвинулась в Харьковской области -ВСУ потеряли контроль над 5 посёлками
Продвижение ВС РФ на участке сел Стрелечье-Красное-Пыльная-Борисовка в направлении Липцов и у поселка Плетеневка к Волчанску.
Об этом сообщают работающие на ВСУ военные аналитики, публикующие карты появившейся сегодня обширной серой зоны.
Противник сообщает о наступательных операциях пехотных подразделений при небольшой поддержке бронетехники, под прикрытием огня артиллерии, ударных и разведывательных дронов и систем РЭБ.
🇷🇺⚔️Армия России продвинулась в Харьковской области -ВСУ потеряли контроль над 5 посёлками
Продвижение ВС РФ на участке сел Стрелечье-Красное-Пыльная-Борисовка в направлении Липцов и у поселка Плетеневка к Волчанску.
Об этом сообщают работающие на ВСУ военные аналитики, публикующие карты появившейся сегодня обширной серой зоны.
Противник сообщает о наступательных операциях пехотных подразделений при небольшой поддержке бронетехники, под прикрытием огня артиллерии, ударных и разведывательных дронов и систем РЭБ.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website.
from fr
