🚜 Сейчас в приоритете расчистка основных магистралей и тротуаров. Затем техника будет переброшена на второстепенные дороги, а также сконцентрирована на сборе и вывозе снега с обочин.
По прогнозу синоптиков нас ожидают перепады температур, в связи с чем проводится обработка противогололедными материалами.
🚗 Просим челябинцев быть предельно внимательными и аккуратными на дорогах.
🚜 Сейчас в приоритете расчистка основных магистралей и тротуаров. Затем техника будет переброшена на второстепенные дороги, а также сконцентрирована на сборе и вывозе снега с обочин.
По прогнозу синоптиков нас ожидают перепады температур, в связи с чем проводится обработка противогололедными материалами.
🚗 Просим челябинцев быть предельно внимательными и аккуратными на дорогах.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred."
from fr