Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 256 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 8448 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ашдщдщпштщаа | Telegram Webview: fllgnff/297 -
Что объединяет «Мост в Терабитию» с «Ванильным небом» — кроме того, что я оба фильма очень люблю? И там, и там есть сцена, где героиня говорит герою «Увидимся». И всё, пиздец, больше никогда они не увидятся. И там, и там герои не знают, что это её последнее слово ему. Причем это только в нашем дубляже так: Анна-София Робб говорит «See you», а Пенелопа Крус — «So, we'll meet up soon», то есть навряд ли сценаристы «Моста» сознательно цитировали «Небо». Какие пронзительные сцены, тем не менее, и какая невозможно жуткая перекличка.
Что объединяет «Мост в Терабитию» с «Ванильным небом» — кроме того, что я оба фильма очень люблю? И там, и там есть сцена, где героиня говорит герою «Увидимся». И всё, пиздец, больше никогда они не увидятся. И там, и там герои не знают, что это её последнее слово ему. Причем это только в нашем дубляже так: Анна-София Робб говорит «See you», а Пенелопа Крус — «So, we'll meet up soon», то есть навряд ли сценаристы «Моста» сознательно цитировали «Небо». Какие пронзительные сцены, тем не менее, и какая невозможно жуткая перекличка.
BY ашдщдщпштщаа
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from fr
