Все же понимают, что Венгрия, это не "голос Путина", а голос самого "Евросоюза". Ровно как и "республиканцы" в США, "купленные Россией". Банальное сохранение окна для альтернативы и собственной свободы рук. То же и у нас, кстати, правда в меньшей степени свободы и большей - контроля (Явлинский тому пример).
Все же понимают, что Венгрия, это не "голос Путина", а голос самого "Евросоюза". Ровно как и "республиканцы" в США, "купленные Россией". Банальное сохранение окна для альтернативы и собственной свободы рук. То же и у нас, кстати, правда в меньшей степени свободы и большей - контроля (Явлинский тому пример).
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from fr
