#والاحضرت قصد دارند تا با همکاری جمهوری‌خواهانِ چپ و لیبرال و دموکرات و با سر دادن شعارهای عوام پسند ؛ #میراث_پادشاهی را بر باد دهند و سلطنت طلبهای تندرو به من میگویند: 👈 #خسرو_خفه_شو ... هرچه او میگوید درست است .
تو گویی گفتار او در نظرشان #وحی_منزل است و نیاز به هزارگونه تفسیر دارد تا همواره توجیه باشند و توجیه باشد ... نه اینبار 👈 #نه https://www.group-telegram.com/fr/khosrovanooshiravan.com/3184 🙋♂ من #خسرو هستم و همینجا در زمین سفت #ایران خواهم ایستاد #نه_به_هرنوع_جمهوری #آری_به_پادشاهی_پارلمانی #پاینده_ایران #جاوید_شاه
#والاحضرت قصد دارند تا با همکاری جمهوری‌خواهانِ چپ و لیبرال و دموکرات و با سر دادن شعارهای عوام پسند ؛ #میراث_پادشاهی را بر باد دهند و سلطنت طلبهای تندرو به من میگویند: 👈 #خسرو_خفه_شو ... هرچه او میگوید درست است .
تو گویی گفتار او در نظرشان #وحی_منزل است و نیاز به هزارگونه تفسیر دارد تا همواره توجیه باشند و توجیه باشد ... نه اینبار 👈 #نه https://www.group-telegram.com/fr/khosrovanooshiravan.com/3184 🙋♂ من #خسرو هستم و همینجا در زمین سفت #ایران خواهم ایستاد #نه_به_هرنوع_جمهوری #آری_به_پادشاهی_پارلمانی #پاینده_ایران #جاوید_شاه
BY خسرو انوشیروان
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from fr
