Вчера Идо Элам и Соль Бехар Цалик публично отказались от прохождения срочной службы в израильской армии по причине геноцида в Газе и продолжающейся оккупации. Их посадили в военную тюрьму на 30 дней. После повторного отказа от службы их посадят вновь.
Вместе с ними на четвертый срок приехал Итамар Гринберг — сознательный отказчик, который уже отсидел 105 дней в военной тюрьме. Также все еще находится под тюремным заключением Юваль Моав, отказчик, просидевший уже около ста дней.
Роман, активист Компаса, который был сознательным отказчиком в 2019, поговорил с Идо Эламом перед его отказом и заключением в военную тюрьму.
Вчера Идо Элам и Соль Бехар Цалик публично отказались от прохождения срочной службы в израильской армии по причине геноцида в Газе и продолжающейся оккупации. Их посадили в военную тюрьму на 30 дней. После повторного отказа от службы их посадят вновь.
Вместе с ними на четвертый срок приехал Итамар Гринберг — сознательный отказчик, который уже отсидел 105 дней в военной тюрьме. Также все еще находится под тюремным заключением Юваль Моав, отказчик, просидевший уже около ста дней.
Роман, активист Компаса, который был сознательным отказчиком в 2019, поговорил с Идо Эламом перед его отказом и заключением в военную тюрьму.
BY КОМПАС
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from fr
