این فصل‌نامه توسط دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهواز و با همکاری انجمن مطالعات سیاسی حوزه منتشر می‌شود. مدیر مسئول: دکتر حامد عامری گلستانی (استادیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اهواز) سردبیر: دکتر علی شیرخانی (استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قم) سایت: https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/iirp/ ای‌میل: [email protected] تلفن، واتساپ و تلگرام نشریه: 09352216987 https://www.group-telegram.com/iirp_journal
این فصل‌نامه توسط دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهواز و با همکاری انجمن مطالعات سیاسی حوزه منتشر می‌شود. مدیر مسئول: دکتر حامد عامری گلستانی (استادیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اهواز) سردبیر: دکتر علی شیرخانی (استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قم) سایت: https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/iirp/ ای‌میل: [email protected] تلفن، واتساپ و تلگرام نشریه: 09352216987 https://www.group-telegram.com/iirp_journal
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from fr
