Одна подружка-эстетичка научила меня этому приемчику. Ничего страшного, если у вас нет специального кольца для салфеток или ленточек хотя как это у вас нет ленточек? Достаточно веревки и овощей в холодильнике. Voila! У вас исключительно красивый и вкусный декор.
Только помыть не забудьте, ваш реквизит точно съедят. 😛
Одна подружка-эстетичка научила меня этому приемчику. Ничего страшного, если у вас нет специального кольца для салфеток или ленточек хотя как это у вас нет ленточек? Достаточно веревки и овощей в холодильнике. Voila! У вас исключительно красивый и вкусный декор.
Только помыть не забудьте, ваш реквизит точно съедят. 😛
A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from fr
