Агентство Блумберг привычно наврало про переговоры России с нынешним сирийским руководством о продлении контракта на использование военных баз между Москвой и Дамаском. Новая власть не вышла на прямой контакт, а американцы ищут следы контактов. В желании знать судьбу баз они и вбрасывают фейки. Переговоры о продлении контракта обязательно будут. Базы никто не трогает. Российским военным ничего не угрожает, и воздушный мост Сирии с Россией работает без проблем.
Агентство Блумберг привычно наврало про переговоры России с нынешним сирийским руководством о продлении контракта на использование военных баз между Москвой и Дамаском. Новая власть не вышла на прямой контакт, а американцы ищут следы контактов. В желании знать судьбу баз они и вбрасывают фейки. Переговоры о продлении контракта обязательно будут. Базы никто не трогает. Российским военным ничего не угрожает, и воздушный мост Сирии с Россией работает без проблем.
BY Это ещё не конец
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from fr
