Внимание Розыгрыш🔔 Говорят бесплатный бензин не бывает, врут!) 5️⃣0️⃣литров бензина 92 ⛽️или деньгами💵 получат случайный подписчик. Для участия достаточно подписаться на наши каналы и нажать кнопку «Участвовать»
Внимание Розыгрыш🔔 Говорят бесплатный бензин не бывает, врут!) 5️⃣0️⃣литров бензина 92 ⛽️или деньгами💵 получат случайный подписчик. Для участия достаточно подписаться на наши каналы и нажать кнопку «Участвовать»
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. The regulator said it had received information that messages containing stock tips and other investment advice with respect to selected listed companies are being widely circulated through websites and social media platforms such as Telegram, Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts.
from fr
