Поспрашивали 3-е место 🥉 и узнали у 1-ого про 🎒а 2-ое место не успели спросить 🙋♂️ ищите в комментах 🔎 кстати, победители, добро пожаловать в систему форы, которая выйдет в обновлении pt OS 2.1 🧑💻
Поспрашивали 3-е место 🥉 и узнали у 1-ого про 🎒а 2-ое место не успели спросить 🙋♂️ ищите в комментах 🔎 кстати, победители, добро пожаловать в систему форы, которая выйдет в обновлении pt OS 2.1 🧑💻
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from fr
