Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 9416 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Право На Лево | Telegram Webview: pravo_na_levo1/1384 -
Имя киллера "труновской" ОПГ исчезло из публикации в СМИ
Редакция новостного портала NGS.ru была вынуждена удалить имя Дмитрия Буоля из публикации о возвращении киллера "труновской" ОПГ в Новосибирск по требованию Роскомнадзора.
Служба указала журналистам на запрет распространения персональных данных действующих военнослужащих Минобороны РФ.
Имя киллера "труновской" ОПГ исчезло из публикации в СМИ
Редакция новостного портала NGS.ru была вынуждена удалить имя Дмитрия Буоля из публикации о возвращении киллера "труновской" ОПГ в Новосибирск по требованию Роскомнадзора.
Служба указала журналистам на запрет распространения персональных данных действующих военнослужащих Минобороны РФ.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from fr
