🔺️انجمن علمی علوم سیاسی با همکاری انجمن ایرانی مطالعات منطقه‌ای شعبه خراسان جنوبی، گروه پژوهشی افغانستان، کانون فرهنگی و هنری دهکده و معاونت فرهنگی و اجتماعی دانشگاه بیرجند برگزار می‌کند
✅️نشست بررسی روابط ایران و افغانستان در دولت سیزدهم
♦️با حضور دکتر احمد بخشی عضو هیئت علمی گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه بیرجند
🔺️انجمن علمی علوم سیاسی با همکاری انجمن ایرانی مطالعات منطقه‌ای شعبه خراسان جنوبی، گروه پژوهشی افغانستان، کانون فرهنگی و هنری دهکده و معاونت فرهنگی و اجتماعی دانشگاه بیرجند برگزار می‌کند
✅️نشست بررسی روابط ایران و افغانستان در دولت سیزدهم
♦️با حضور دکتر احمد بخشی عضو هیئت علمی گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه بیرجند
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For tech stocks, “the main thing is yields,” Essaye said. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts.
from fr
