🐆ҚР Президентінің Телерадиокешені мобильді форматта түсірілген Ресей Президенті Владимир Путиннің Қазақстанғамемлекеттік сапары мен Астанада өткен ҰҚШҰ-ның Ұжымдық қауіпсіздік кеңесі туралы деректі фильм ұсынады
🐆ҚР Президентінің Телерадиокешені мобильді форматта түсірілген Ресей Президенті Владимир Путиннің Қазақстанғамемлекеттік сапары мен Астанада өткен ҰҚШҰ-ның Ұжымдық қауіпсіздік кеңесі туралы деректі фильм ұсынады
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from fr