В Госдуму направлен законопроект, позволяющий конфисковывать машины россиян для нужд СВО в зоне КТО в Курской, Белгородской и Брянской областях.
Что это значит? Признание в неспособности обеспечить потребность в транспорте у военных и волонтеров. А еще это нарушение Конституции. Впрочем, когда это кого-либо волновало...
В Госдуму направлен законопроект, позволяющий конфисковывать машины россиян для нужд СВО в зоне КТО в Курской, Белгородской и Брянской областях.
Что это значит? Признание в неспособности обеспечить потребность в транспорте у военных и волонтеров. А еще это нарушение Конституции. Впрочем, когда это кого-либо волновало...
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from fr
