Россия закрыла польское генконсульство в Петербурге в ответ на решение Польши о закрытии консульства России в Познани.
Москва уведомила Варшаву о закрытии польского генконсульства в Петербурге, передает ТАСС. По данным МИД РФ, это решение стало ответной мерой на закрытие 30 ноября польскими властями российского консульства в Познани. С 10 января 2025 года польское генконсульство в Петербурге прекратит свою деятельность.
Россия закрыла польское генконсульство в Петербурге в ответ на решение Польши о закрытии консульства России в Познани.
Москва уведомила Варшаву о закрытии польского генконсульства в Петербурге, передает ТАСС. По данным МИД РФ, это решение стало ответной мерой на закрытие 30 ноября польскими властями российского консульства в Познани. С 10 января 2025 года польское генконсульство в Петербурге прекратит свою деятельность.
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from fr
