00:23 Движущие мотивы западнизма 03:36 Культура 07:49 Западноевропейская культура 11:37 Западная идеология о новой культуре 13:39 Культура западнизма 21:33 Кино 22:29 Литература 22:58 Идеологический механизм 26:09 "Церковь" западнизма 27:42 Масс-медиа 35:55 Реклама 36:40 Западнизм и религия 39:35 Образ жизни 40:43 Жизненный стандарт
00:23 Движущие мотивы западнизма 03:36 Культура 07:49 Западноевропейская культура 11:37 Западная идеология о новой культуре 13:39 Культура западнизма 21:33 Кино 22:29 Литература 22:58 Идеологический механизм 26:09 "Церковь" западнизма 27:42 Масс-медиа 35:55 Реклама 36:40 Западнизм и религия 39:35 Образ жизни 40:43 Жизненный стандарт
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from fr
