Унаслідок атаки в Одеському районі сталося руйнування двоповерхової будівлі, де жили та працювали цивільні,повідомив голова ОВА Олег Кіпер. Троє людей загинули під уламками будівлі, серед них 43-річна жінка, 22-річний хлопець та 16-річна дівчина. Ще одна жінка померла в лікарні.
Десять людей отримали поранення та травми, девʼятьох з них госпіталізували. Четверо людей у важкому стані, додали в ОВА.
Унаслідок атаки в Одеському районі сталося руйнування двоповерхової будівлі, де жили та працювали цивільні,повідомив голова ОВА Олег Кіпер. Троє людей загинули під уламками будівлі, серед них 43-річна жінка, 22-річний хлопець та 16-річна дівчина. Ще одна жінка померла в лікарні.
Десять людей отримали поранення та травми, девʼятьох з них госпіталізували. Четверо людей у важкому стані, додали в ОВА.
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from fr
