Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
Всё-таки гений - исключительное дело. Обратите внимание на лаконичность и ясность мысли.
Для тех, кому лень: 2005 год, Adobe нанимает людей из Apple, одного уже наняли, ещё многих переманивают. Стив Джобс пишет об этом письмо директору Adobe, где говорит, что у него политика - не нанимать из Adobe (высшая степень дружбы между компаниями). Но, раз у Adobe подход другой, один из них политику должен поменять.
К такому надо стремиться: сколько стиля и власти в скромном "please let me know who".
Upd. Против Adobe и Apple было дело по этому поводу - наверное, так и стало доступным письмо, потому что document production.
And in the past few years, the DOJ brought three civil enforcement actions against technology companies (eBay and Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar, and Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar) that entered into “no poach” agreements with competitors. In all three cases, the competitors agreed not to cold call each other’s employees. In two cases, at least one company also agreed to limit its hiring of employees who currently worked at a competitor.
All three cases ended in consent judgments against the technology companies.
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Apparently upbeat developments in Russia's discussions with Ukraine helped at least temporarily send investors back into risk assets. Russian President Vladimir Putin said during a meeting with his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko that there were "certain positive developments" occurring in the talks with Ukraine, according to a transcript of their meeting. Putin added that discussions were happening "almost on a daily basis." Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from fr
