Красота в разнообразии, а попытка всех построить под один опыт - это на самом деле сектантство. Получше разберитесь о чём говорит отец Пётр. ТЕрстеген, Шпенер, Арндт в главном не противоречат отцам древности
Красота в разнообразии, а попытка всех построить под один опыт - это на самом деле сектантство. Получше разберитесь о чём говорит отец Пётр. ТЕрстеген, Шпенер, Арндт в главном не противоречат отцам древности
BY Уранополитика
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform.
from fr
