Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 9742 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Канал визионера | Telegram Webview: vizioner_rf/5370 -
Евгений Пригожин жив и появился вчера в вечернем эфире панафриканского канала Afrique Media: "Да, действительно, часть активов (в Африке) я продал", но "безусловно, мы продолжаем работать во всех тех странах, где начинали и ведем сейчас работу", и "открыты к дальнейшему сотрудничеству и развитию, при условии, что поставленные задачи не будут противоречить интересам России".
Евгений Пригожин жив и появился вчера в вечернем эфире панафриканского канала Afrique Media: "Да, действительно, часть активов (в Африке) я продал", но "безусловно, мы продолжаем работать во всех тех странах, где начинали и ведем сейчас работу", и "открыты к дальнейшему сотрудничеству и развитию, при условии, что поставленные задачи не будут противоречить интересам России".
BY Канал визионера
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from fr
