Залишки імітаційного БпЛА, ймовірно типу «Гербера» в полі на Сумщині.
Більшість БпЛА, які майже цілодобово атакують Україну є саме такими пінопластовими та фанерними фальш-цілями. Під фокусовані атаки русня підмішує до фальшивок ударні Шахеди.
Залишки імітаційного БпЛА, ймовірно типу «Гербера» в полі на Сумщині.
Більшість БпЛА, які майже цілодобово атакують Україну є саме такими пінопластовими та фанерними фальш-цілями. Під фокусовані атаки русня підмішує до фальшивок ударні Шахеди.
"There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from fr
