Выложил на Boosty свой новый текст, посвящённый критике пацифизма со стороны Элизабет Энском. В тексте я касаюсь двух интерпретаций этой критики — Родерика Т. Лонга и Михаила Пожарского — и пытаюсь показать, почему на мой взгляд обе эти интерпретации ошибочны. Так же я отвечаю на некоторые возражения, которые часто приводят в ответ на аргументы Энском против пацифизма. Я крайне благодарен своим друзьям и коллегам — Дмитрию Середе, Константину Морозову и Софии Широгоровой — за помощь в редактуре и за ценные комментарии, касающиеся содержания текста.
Выложил на Boosty свой новый текст, посвящённый критике пацифизма со стороны Элизабет Энском. В тексте я касаюсь двух интерпретаций этой критики — Родерика Т. Лонга и Михаила Пожарского — и пытаюсь показать, почему на мой взгляд обе эти интерпретации ошибочны. Так же я отвечаю на некоторые возражения, которые часто приводят в ответ на аргументы Энском против пацифизма. Я крайне благодарен своим друзьям и коллегам — Дмитрию Середе, Константину Морозову и Софии Широгоровой — за помощь в редактуре и за ценные комментарии, касающиеся содержания текста.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. I want a secure messaging app, should I use Telegram?
from fr
