Активы АО "Башкирская содовая компания" перешли государству
Генпрокуратура РФ сообщила, что акции БСК перечислены на лицевой счет Росимущества. Органы прокуратуры организовали надзор, чтобы обеспечить законность в деятельности компании. Приватизацию предприятия стали проверять и отменять после того, как на протесты жителей и экологов из-за действий предприятия обратил внимание президент Путин. Президент потребовал проверить законность сделки, в результате которой государство утратило контроль над предприятием. Генпрокуратура нашла нарушения уже через два дня
Активы АО "Башкирская содовая компания" перешли государству
Генпрокуратура РФ сообщила, что акции БСК перечислены на лицевой счет Росимущества. Органы прокуратуры организовали надзор, чтобы обеспечить законность в деятельности компании. Приватизацию предприятия стали проверять и отменять после того, как на протесты жителей и экологов из-за действий предприятия обратил внимание президент Путин. Президент потребовал проверить законность сделки, в результате которой государство утратило контроль над предприятием. Генпрокуратура нашла нарушения уже через два дня
#воттакновости
BY Ямантау
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides.
from fr
