What kind orchestrated RICO crime would it be to use deceptive strategies and practices to pretend that a mentally diminished executive is doing a job he’s no longer able to do?
And this criminal conspiracy manages to operate successfully for several years before it’s exposed?
And it turns certain persons involved in this criminal cover up were enriching/benefiting themselves while keeping the conspiracy going?
In the fallout and aftermath of that criminal conspiracy being exposed, acknowledged, and admitted to, are legal challenges to any official actions undertaken by the criminals in question very strong, or would you consider such challenges to be extremely weak?
What do you think?
Oh, and Retroactively applying the 25th to Joe - backdated to the Hur report dates, nullifying everything Joe did from that date onward. Those pardons would not stand. They won't stand anyway.
The secondary part is that everyone who hid it and pretended joe was cognizant is complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the public. Hold your heads high, America.
What kind orchestrated RICO crime would it be to use deceptive strategies and practices to pretend that a mentally diminished executive is doing a job he’s no longer able to do?
And this criminal conspiracy manages to operate successfully for several years before it’s exposed?
And it turns certain persons involved in this criminal cover up were enriching/benefiting themselves while keeping the conspiracy going?
In the fallout and aftermath of that criminal conspiracy being exposed, acknowledged, and admitted to, are legal challenges to any official actions undertaken by the criminals in question very strong, or would you consider such challenges to be extremely weak?
What do you think?
Oh, and Retroactively applying the 25th to Joe - backdated to the Hur report dates, nullifying everything Joe did from that date onward. Those pardons would not stand. They won't stand anyway.
The secondary part is that everyone who hid it and pretended joe was cognizant is complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the public. Hold your heads high, America.
~BC/T
BY Out of the Dark®️ 🌔 🇺🇸 🌕
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
For tech stocks, “the main thing is yields,” Essaye said. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from fr
