Gradient Dude

⚡️SD3-Turbo: Fast High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Adversarial Diffusion Distillation

Following Stable Diffusion 3, my ex-colleagues have published a preprint on SD3 distillation using 4-step, while maintaining quality.

The new method – Latent Adversarial Diffusion Distillation (LADD), which is similar to ADD (see post about it in @ai_newz), but with a number of differences:

️↪️ Both teacher and student are on a Transformer-based SD3 architecture here.
The biggest and best model has 8B parameters.

️↪️Instead of DINOv2 discriminator working on RGB pixels, this article suggests going back to latent space discriminator in order to work faster and burn less memory.

️↪️A copy of the teacher is taken as a discriminator (i.e. the discriminator is trained generatively instead of discriminatively, as in the case of DINO). After each attention block, a discriminator head with 2D conv layers that classifies real/fake is added. This way the discriminator looks not only at the final result but at all in-between features, which strengthens the training signal.

️↪️Trained on pictures with different aspect ratios, rather than just 1:1 squares.

️↪️They removed L2 reconstruction loss between Teacher's and Student's outputs. It's said that a blunt discriminator is enough if you choose the sampling distribution of steps t wisely.

️↪️During training, they more frequently sample t with more noise so that the student learns to generate the global structure of objects better.

️↪️Distillation is performed on synthetic data which was generated by the teacher, rather than on a photo from a dataset, as was the case in ADD.

It's also been shown that the DPO-LoRA tuning is a pretty nice way to add to the quality of the student's generations.

So, we get SD3-Turbo model producing nice pics in 4 steps. According to a small Human Eval (conducted only on 128 prompts), the student is comparable to the teacher in terms of image quality. But the student's prompt alignment is inferior, which is expected.

📖 Paper

@gradientdude

Please open Telegram to view this post

VIEW IN TELEGRAM

www.group-telegram.com/us/gradientdude.com/350

4.2K viewsMar 30, 2024 at 17:11

⚡️SD3-Turbo: Fast High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Adversarial Diffusion Distillation

Following Stable Diffusion 3, my ex-colleagues have published a preprint on SD3 distillation using 4-step, while maintaining quality.

The new method – Latent Adversarial Diffusion Distillation (LADD), which is similar to ADD (see post about it in @ai_newz), but with a number of differences:

️↪️ Both teacher and student are on a Transformer-based SD3 architecture here.
The biggest and best model has 8B parameters.

️↪️Instead of DINOv2 discriminator working on RGB pixels, this article suggests going back to latent space discriminator in order to work faster and burn less memory.

️↪️A copy of the teacher is taken as a discriminator (i.e. the discriminator is trained generatively instead of discriminatively, as in the case of DINO). After each attention block, a discriminator head with 2D conv layers that classifies real/fake is added. This way the discriminator looks not only at the final result but at all in-between features, which strengthens the training signal.

️↪️Trained on pictures with different aspect ratios, rather than just 1:1 squares.

️↪️They removed L2 reconstruction loss between Teacher's and Student's outputs. It's said that a blunt discriminator is enough if you choose the sampling distribution of steps t wisely.

️↪️During training, they more frequently sample t with more noise so that the student learns to generate the global structure of objects better.

️↪️Distillation is performed on synthetic data which was generated by the teacher, rather than on a photo from a dataset, as was the case in ADD.

It's also been shown that the DPO-LoRA tuning is a pretty nice way to add to the quality of the student's generations.

So, we get SD3-Turbo model producing nice pics in 4 steps. According to a small Human Eval (conducted only on 128 prompts), the student is comparable to the teacher in terms of image quality. But the student's prompt alignment is inferior, which is expected.

📖 Paper

@gradientdude