Верховний суд США постановив, що бан китайської соцмережі не порушує Конституцію і залишив в силі закон, який вимагає китайців продати соцмережу, або вона буде забанена.
Верховний суд США постановив, що бан китайської соцмережі не порушує Конституцію і залишив в силі закон, який вимагає китайців продати соцмережу, або вона буде забанена.
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety.
from us
