«Глава ДНР» Денис Пушилин заявляет, что 17 сентября при атаке БПЛА на легковой автомобиль в Никитовском районе Горловки мужчина 1997 г.р. получил ранения.
По данным «СЦКК ДНР», днём 18 сентября в результате сброса боеприпасов с БПЛА в г. Горловка был ранен мужчина 1964 г.р., а в п. Владимировка пострадал мужчина 2001 г.р.
«Глава ДНР» Денис Пушилин заявляет, что 17 сентября при атаке БПЛА на легковой автомобиль в Никитовском районе Горловки мужчина 1997 г.р. получил ранения.
По данным «СЦКК ДНР», днём 18 сентября в результате сброса боеприпасов с БПЛА в г. Горловка был ранен мужчина 1964 г.р., а в п. Владимировка пострадал мужчина 2001 г.р.
BY Сводки по обcтрелам гражданской инфраструктуры от волонтеров CIT
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from hk
