🔸به اطلاع دانشجویان محترم می‌رساند پیرو پیگیری‌‌های صورت پذیرفته من باب موضوع اورژانس، طبق گزارش مسئولین مربوطه مکان قرارگیری واحد اورژانس به تایید کارشناس بهداشت رسیده است. لذا این مهم همچنان در دست بررسی هیئت رئیسه دانشگاه قرار دارد.
🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶
#کمیته_رفاهی شورای صنفی دانشجویان دانشگاه خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی
🔸به اطلاع دانشجویان محترم می‌رساند پیرو پیگیری‌‌های صورت پذیرفته من باب موضوع اورژانس، طبق گزارش مسئولین مربوطه مکان قرارگیری واحد اورژانس به تایید کارشناس بهداشت رسیده است. لذا این مهم همچنان در دست بررسی هیئت رئیسه دانشگاه قرار دارد.
🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶
#کمیته_رفاهی شورای صنفی دانشجویان دانشگاه خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from hk
