Бадра Гунба отметил серьезный результат, которого добились вместе со сторонниками:
«Не было и не будет такой возможности противостоять мнению народа. Мы это мнение народа отстоим. У нас хватит духа, чтобы не дать никому спровоцировать наше общество».
Бадра Гунба отметил серьезный результат, которого добились вместе со сторонниками:
«Не было и не будет такой возможности противостоять мнению народа. Мы это мнение народа отстоим. У нас хватит духа, чтобы не дать никому спровоцировать наше общество».
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read."
from hk
