TikTok массово заблокировал аккаунты Sputnik, в том числе «Sputnik Абхазия» TikTok без объяснения причин удалил аккаунт Sputnik International, передает Sputnik (входит в медиахолдинг «Россия сегодня»).
По данным RT, блокировке также подверглись 11 страниц Sputnik дальнего зарубежья и 26 — ближнего, в частности «Sputnik Абхазия», «Sputnik Армения» (на русском и армянском языках), «Sputnik Беларусь» и Sputnik Stories.
Также площадка удалила страницу RT International. Как отметил телеканал, причина не была озвучена. Источник
TikTok массово заблокировал аккаунты Sputnik, в том числе «Sputnik Абхазия» TikTok без объяснения причин удалил аккаунт Sputnik International, передает Sputnik (входит в медиахолдинг «Россия сегодня»).
По данным RT, блокировке также подверглись 11 страниц Sputnik дальнего зарубежья и 26 — ближнего, в частности «Sputnik Абхазия», «Sputnik Армения» (на русском и армянском языках), «Sputnik Беларусь» и Sputnik Stories.
Также площадка удалила страницу RT International. Как отметил телеканал, причина не была озвучена. Источник
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from hk
