🌲 Хорошие новости для любителей ужаса и кровищи... Вышел в продажу сборник «Чёрный новый год»!
Наш новый Новый год абсолютно такой же чёрный, что и старый (2021 года) — но на переднюю сторону обложки долили багрянца и поставили чуть более плотную бумагу. 🌲
🌲 Хорошие новости для любителей ужаса и кровищи... Вышел в продажу сборник «Чёрный новый год»!
Наш новый Новый год абсолютно такой же чёрный, что и старый (2021 года) — но на переднюю сторону обложки долили багрянца и поставили чуть более плотную бумагу. 🌲
For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital.
from hk