Brian Cates @drawandstrike There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...
1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim
or
2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.
I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.
❓Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?
❓Or did Priebus just make it up?
❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.
Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.
Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...
❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.
So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.
So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:
Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.
I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.
Brian Cates @drawandstrike There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...
1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim
or
2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.
I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.
❓Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?
❓Or did Priebus just make it up?
❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.
Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.
Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...
❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.
So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.
So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:
Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.
I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.
The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from hk
