У Родиона нет вариантов не втянуться в нашу тусовку - задействован с пеленок.
Не планировала пока целенаправленно его вовлекать, он и так пассивный участник всех англомероприятий брата, но когда есть поддержка и система, тут уже без вариантов)
P.s. Руки даже до тактильной книги дошли, сама не ожидала 📓
У Родиона нет вариантов не втянуться в нашу тусовку - задействован с пеленок.
Не планировала пока целенаправленно его вовлекать, он и так пассивный участник всех англомероприятий брата, но когда есть поддержка и система, тут уже без вариантов)
P.s. Руки даже до тактильной книги дошли, сама не ожидала 📓
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from hk
