Josue Ortega Caro ... David van Dijk. BrainLM: A foundation model for brain activity recordings. bioRxiv, January 13, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.12.557460
Заявления делаются громкие, но при беглом просмотре препринта я не смог найти в нем примеров, явным образом подтверждающих, что модель действительно может быть полезна в каких-то конкретных задачах.
Josue Ortega Caro ... David van Dijk. BrainLM: A foundation model for brain activity recordings. bioRxiv, January 13, 2024 https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.12.557460
Заявления делаются громкие, но при беглом просмотре препринта я не смог найти в нем примеров, явным образом подтверждающих, что модель действительно может быть полезна в каких-то конкретных задачах.
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? WhatsApp, a rival messaging platform, introduced some measures to counter disinformation when Covid-19 was first sweeping the world. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from hk
