Всяко больше пользы, чем от "уроков о важном" в детском саду. К стыду своему не сразу врубился, что за картинка иллюстрирует статью "Право на свободу", а потом дошло - это же золотые волосы Рапунцель, выброшенные из башни, куда ее заточили. )))
Всяко больше пользы, чем от "уроков о важном" в детском саду. К стыду своему не сразу врубился, что за картинка иллюстрирует статью "Право на свободу", а потом дошло - это же золотые волосы Рапунцель, выброшенные из башни, куда ее заточили. )))
"Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from hk
