💥🏰Более полное видео удара беспилотника по куполу Сенатского дворца в Кремле
Напомним, первый беспилотник был замечен над Кремлём в 2:27 ночи по Московскому времени. Он взорвался над Сенатским дворцом, после чего на его крыше произошло возгорание.
Удар второго беспилотника зафиксирован в 2:43 ночи. Его обломки упали на территорию Кремля.
💥🏰Более полное видео удара беспилотника по куполу Сенатского дворца в Кремле
Напомним, первый беспилотник был замечен над Кремлём в 2:27 ночи по Московскому времени. Он взорвался над Сенатским дворцом, после чего на его крыше произошло возгорание.
Удар второго беспилотника зафиксирован в 2:43 ночи. Его обломки упали на территорию Кремля.
BY БЫСТРО
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from hk
