💥🏴☠️Губернатор Белгородской области прокомментировал новый обстрел - «ВСУ обстреляли город Шебекино снарядами «Града» ⠀ Во многих пабликах появилась информация, что есть один погибший и два пострадавших в автобусе. Информация не подтверждается ни главой округа, ни бригадой скорой помощи, которая осмотрела автобус, - он пустой. ⠀ Но в округе есть один пострадавший - мужчина с осколочным ранением правой стопы. Также от прямого попадания снарядов горит здание общежития, разрушения есть и в здании администрации. В городе нет света. Вся информация уточняется».
💥🏴☠️Губернатор Белгородской области прокомментировал новый обстрел - «ВСУ обстреляли город Шебекино снарядами «Града» ⠀ Во многих пабликах появилась информация, что есть один погибший и два пострадавших в автобусе. Информация не подтверждается ни главой округа, ни бригадой скорой помощи, которая осмотрела автобус, - он пустой. ⠀ Но в округе есть один пострадавший - мужчина с осколочным ранением правой стопы. Также от прямого попадания снарядов горит здание общежития, разрушения есть и в здании администрации. В городе нет света. Вся информация уточняется».
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation.
from hk
