🇷🇺 На прошедшем турнире в Нижнем Новгороде в поддержку славянских бойцов выступила «Русская Трибуна». Отдельно хотелось бы отметить русичей за поддержку батальона «Светлояр».
Помимо флага батальона и зарядов «1-0-6» вместе с нашим девизом «Отбоя не было! Борьба продолжается!» все обратили внимание на новшество на трибуне — двуручники на секторе с нашими символами!
🇷🇺 На прошедшем турнире в Нижнем Новгороде в поддержку славянских бойцов выступила «Русская Трибуна». Отдельно хотелось бы отметить русичей за поддержку батальона «Светлояр».
Помимо флага батальона и зарядов «1-0-6» вместе с нашим девизом «Отбоя не было! Борьба продолжается!» все обратили внимание на новшество на трибуне — двуручники на секторе с нашими символами!
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from hk
