Такого ажиотажа среди волонтеров я не помню никогда. Тысячи людей хотят помочь: отправить деньги, поехать отмывать птиц, убирать мазут, варить плов, чтобы накормить волонтеров… Отозвались, наверное, все передержки, питомники и хосписы для диких животных не только на Кубани, но и во всех соседних регионах. Слов нет. Супер люди!
Такого ажиотажа среди волонтеров я не помню никогда. Тысячи людей хотят помочь: отправить деньги, поехать отмывать птиц, убирать мазут, варить плов, чтобы накормить волонтеров… Отозвались, наверное, все передержки, питомники и хосписы для диких животных не только на Кубани, но и во всех соседних регионах. Слов нет. Супер люди!
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from hk
