"При этом надо подчеркнуть, что у Глотова была еще относительно благополучная судьба: его только приписали к кулакам, но не выслали и не арестовали. Семья потеряла лишь все нажитое собственным нелегким трудом, голодала, но после потрясений коллективизации все ее члены остались живы."
М. Мильчик, предисловие к дневнику крестьянина Ивана Глотова,опубл. 1997
"При этом надо подчеркнуть, что у Глотова была еще относительно благополучная судьба: его только приписали к кулакам, но не выслали и не арестовали. Семья потеряла лишь все нажитое собственным нелегким трудом, голодала, но после потрясений коллективизации все ее члены остались живы."
М. Мильчик, предисловие к дневнику крестьянина Ивана Глотова,опубл. 1997
б – благополучие, (блин)
BY записки молодого враля
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from hk
