Face au régime algérien qui multiplie les provocations, il est temps d'assumer le rapport de force. Et de faire respecter la voix de la France.
Entre l’aveuglement de l’extrême gauche et la haine aveugle de l’extrême droite, il y a un chemin : c’est celui d’une relation nouvelle avec l’Algérie, une relation dépassionnée, fondée sur le respect. Respect de nos lois, de nos frontières, de nos intérêts, et entre nos deux peuples.
➜ Retrouvez ma tribune publiée dans le Figaro en cliquant juste ici. ⤵️
Face au régime algérien qui multiplie les provocations, il est temps d'assumer le rapport de force. Et de faire respecter la voix de la France.
Entre l’aveuglement de l’extrême gauche et la haine aveugle de l’extrême droite, il y a un chemin : c’est celui d’une relation nouvelle avec l’Algérie, une relation dépassionnée, fondée sur le respect. Respect de nos lois, de nos frontières, de nos intérêts, et entre nos deux peuples.
➜ Retrouvez ma tribune publiée dans le Figaro en cliquant juste ici. ⤵️
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows.
from hk