Недавно общался с клиентом по бракоразводному процессу. Мы обсуждали банкротные аспекты. В ходе обсуждения он задал мне интересный вопрос:
⁉️можно ли в брачном контракте указать, что в случае недостойного поведения (измена, пьянство, наркомания, ссоры и пр.) все имущество при разводе остается за добросовестной стороной?
☝🏻Ответ будет сегодня в отдельном посте, а пока я очень хочу ваших мнений по этому поводу
Недавно общался с клиентом по бракоразводному процессу. Мы обсуждали банкротные аспекты. В ходе обсуждения он задал мне интересный вопрос:
⁉️можно ли в брачном контракте указать, что в случае недостойного поведения (измена, пьянство, наркомания, ссоры и пр.) все имущество при разводе остается за добросовестной стороной?
☝🏻Ответ будет сегодня в отдельном посте, а пока я очень хочу ваших мнений по этому поводу
BY Телега юриста Макарова
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists."
from hk
